|
Post by Pamela Honey on May 22, 2008 5:42:19 GMT -5
Yes i think so, jealousy and maby she thinks in her little head that Pam killed Jim.. Or just jealousy about Pam, because she was the one that was with him the last days and hours of his life!?
|
|
gaia
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by gaia on May 22, 2008 13:53:10 GMT -5
yeah I think it's jealousy because, even if she had Jim's child, she would never be Jim's soulmate
|
|
|
Post by Pamela Honey on May 22, 2008 20:16:34 GMT -5
Yeah, thats right! even though i think Jim loved Patricia, i dont think he would ever let pamela go.
|
|
gaia
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by gaia on May 23, 2008 2:41:19 GMT -5
yeah, sure! but it's been more than 37 yrs, now! That's what surprises me. I know it's Jim, but it's been a while... How can someone have so much anger inside? Even after all this time? And why Mr Courson? It's not Pam but her father, and he is not responsible of all this
|
|
|
Post by sherdelune on May 24, 2008 16:08:29 GMT -5
I don't think anyone could classify what Jim felt for PK as 'love.' Of course, none of us was there to know for sure, but he certainly was not calling her his 'cosmic mate.' That was reserved for Pamela.
|
|
|
Post by Pamela Honey on May 25, 2008 9:16:04 GMT -5
i know that Jim loved pamela and that she was his Cosmic Mate but i really believe that he loved PK. Not that i like her or think much of her, but to marry some one means alittle more than nothing.
|
|
gaia
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by gaia on May 25, 2008 10:50:32 GMT -5
maybe he was tripping...
|
|
|
Post by Pamela Honey on May 25, 2008 15:05:57 GMT -5
Maybe, maybe not.
|
|
|
Post by annie on May 25, 2008 18:44:02 GMT -5
there are enough evidence about Jim's feelings to Kennealy, in fact there are letters of him from Paris saying that he was planning to stay there with Pam indefinitely. He married Patricia because IT WAS NOT LEGAL, and it was fun in the moment. That ceremony meant NOTHING to him. He went with PAM to Paris and wanted to stay there with her. Patricia is living in a fairy tale all the time...
|
|
|
Post by Pamela Honey on May 26, 2008 4:47:48 GMT -5
I'm not saying that he loved PK more than Pam, i just said that i think that he loved her too, not as much and not at the same way, but that he loved her. I love allot of guys but i love my boyfriend more. get it?
|
|
|
Post by Pamela Honey on May 26, 2008 4:52:10 GMT -5
where did you read about his letter to pk? i would love to read about them ;D
I don't like PK, i really dont..all that i said was that i would think that he loved her, sins they got married. but maybe it was just a thing that was fun at the moment. I really don't know..
But i know that he loved Pam, and he would do anything for her.
|
|
jazmin
Junior Member
Posts: 66
|
Post by jazmin on May 27, 2008 7:42:23 GMT -5
yes i agree. Jim for sure loved Pamela the most but he certainly must have cared for the other women he chose to spend time with. I know it was the 60's but surely people still had to at least like people to sleep with them. Pamela must have felt much the same about the count as I believe this lasted for a little while too, how much as lovers and how much as friends, obviously I cannot say, but i believe the time in which jim and Pam lived in certainly made other people as lovers a bit more acceptable than maybe today. we will never know how much the wiccan handfasting ment to Jim but it would certainly have ment a lot to Patricia as a witch, and there is little doubt that Jim went through with this, so whether it was as part of his "trip" or to applease Patricia, we will never know, but I honestly believe that she is lucky to have these memories but that surely that is what they should be for her, memories. I think she has got stuck in the land of what iffs rather than in the facts. Anyone agree or indeed disagree with this?
|
|
|
Post by sherdelune on May 27, 2008 8:55:58 GMT -5
The only person to know Jim's intentions regarding that 'marriage' is Jim himself, and he's not here to clarify. This makes it very easy for her to manipulate events to fit into her own representation of the 'facts.' She always mentions letters that Jim had written to her from his time in Paris, yet I do not think she has ever presented one to anyone as proof. And honestly, I would not trust any letter she produced unless it had been authenticated by handwriting experts.
So I do believe that she is living in an elaborate fantasy of her own creation -- steeped heavily in 'what ifs' and ghosts of memories from the past. Sad, really.
|
|
|
Post by Pamela Honey on May 27, 2008 10:54:34 GMT -5
True so true!
|
|
|
Post by wildchild on Jun 15, 2008 20:06:04 GMT -5
That woman is a vile beotch!!! Apparently she does not know much about karma, but someday she will get a real lesson. Very sick woman!!
|
|